Phoenix UTV / ATV Accident Lawyer
Utility & All-Terrain Vehicle Accidents in Arizona
Arizona has ample space for off-roading, and various utility and all-terrain vehicles have become a popular choice for both recreational and occupational purposes. As with any motor vehicle, however, these machines pose substantial risks of injuries to those who ride them – especially when others are negligent.
At MayesTelles PLLC, our attorneys represent victims of ATV, UTV, and ROV accidents throughout Phoenix and the surrounding areas of Arizona. If you or someone you love have been injured in any type of utility vehicle accident due to another’s negligence or wrongful acts, our firm is available 24/7 to discuss your rights and options, as you may be entitled to compensation.
Why MayesTelles?
- Thousands of Successfully Handled Cases
- Millions in Compensation Recovered for Victims
- Personalized Service, Compassionate Representation
- 24/7 Availability, FREE & Confidential Consultations
Contact usto request a free case evaluation.
Types of Utility & Off-Road Vehicles
Off-road vehicles come in many shapes and sizes, but they all pose the potential for serious accidents and injuries. These risks typically increase when riding on sand dunes, dirt roads, mountains, and other dangerous terrain often traversed by utility vehicles.
Although utility and off-road vehicles are referred to by many different names interchangeably by consumers, they are not always synonymous depending on the manufacturer and vehicle model. For example:
- UTVs: Utility Task Vehicles (UTVs) are four-wheel off, off-road vehicles that fit anywhere from 2 to 4 riders. Many UTVs have roll cages for occupant protection, as well as cargo boxes in the backs of vehicles, making them highly useful for people who need to carry equipment, haul supplies, and perform other similar work-related tasks. Although they can look very similar to ATVs, UTVs are made specifically with workers in mind, are more powerful than ATVs, and can handle upwards of 1,000 pounds, depending on the make and model. UTVs may also be called side-by-sides (SxS).
- ATVs: All-Terrain Vehicles (ATVs) are perhaps the most recognized type of off-road vehicle. Designed more for leisure, motor sports, and outdoor activity, ATVs cannot handle the same amount of weight as UTVs, and are more likely to be found on sand dunes and other open spaces where campers, outdoor enthusiasts, and hobbyists can put them to the test. ATVs may be called Quads, Four Wheelers, or other similar recreational vehicle acronyms (ROVs, MUVs, etc.).
- ROVs: Recreational Off-Road Vehicles (ROVs) are a common catch-all term used by many to describe all types of three- or four- wheeled off-road motor vehicles. In addition to UTVs and ATVs, they may also be called Recreational Utility Vehicles (RUVs), Multi-Use Vehicles (MUVs), or Utility Vehicles, though their function and purpose may vary depending on the manufacturer.
ATV & UTV Accidents & Personal Injury Lawsuits
Victims of preventable accidents have the right to hold at-fault parties liable for financial damages arising from their harm and losses. As with any personal injury claim, victims seeking compensation will need to prove another’s negligence (or wrongful acts) caused them harm that could and should have been reasonably avoided.
When it comes to ATVs, UTVs and other types of Recreational Off-Road Vehicles, injured victims and families may pursue personal injury lawsuits for various reasons, including:
- Operator Negligence: When ATVs and ROVs are used in locations popular for off-roading, there are risks for crashes involving two or more vehicles. In these cases, victims may have the opportunity to seek compensation from at-fault operators who fail to use their ROVs in a reasonably safe manner. Examples include operator inattention or distracted driving, dangerous speeds, failures to yield, and failures to use flags, headlights, or other means of vehicle recognition.
- Driving Under the Influence (DUI): UTVs and ATVs are both used widely by consumers for off-road recreation, often at popular campgrounds and outdoor recreation areas. Just as with other forms of outdoor recreation, alcohol is commonly used. When intoxicated UTV or ATV riders cause drunk driving accidents, they can be held liable for damages victims suffer.
- Defective Products: Over the years, many UTV and ATV makers have been sued by consumers who allege their vehicles, or components of their vehicles, were defectively designed, manufactured, or marketed. Polaris, Yamaha, Honda, and other ROV manufacturers have faced product liability suits over ROV fires, defective brakes, faulty fuel lines, tire blowouts, seatbelts, roll-over risks, and other hazards that could have been prevented.
- Unsafe Premises: Depending on where ATVs or UTVs are being used, victims may have potential claims against landowners who failed to address hazards on their property they knew or should have known about. Known as premises liability, property owners have a duty to take reasonable steps in keeping a safe premises, whether that means addressing defective roadways or unreasonable hazards on property where workers use UTVs, or outdoor enthusiasts use ATVs.
- Rental & Tour Companies: Many companies offer ATV and UTV rentals or ATV / UTV off-road tours. As service providers, these companies have a duty to take reasonable measures in keeping their customers safe, including adequate maintenance of their vehicles, proper protective gear, and proper instruction about safe operation and risks. Victims who suffer preventable injuries in accidents may have potential claims against these companies.
Have a Case? Call (602) 428-7104 For a FREE Consultation.
MayesTelles is comprised of highly experienced, award-winning attorneys who are dedicated to helping injured victims and their families seek compensation following serious injuries or wrongful death. If you have a potential accident case involving a UTV, ATV, or any other ROV, our team can help you better understand your rights and whether you may have a viable personal injury claim during a free and confidential consultation.
Call (602) 428-7104 or contact us online to speak with a lawyer.
We've Won Thousands of Cases
-
Charges Reduced to Reckless Driving
Client R.C. was stopped by Mesa Police for a civil traffic violation and later charged with DUI, Extreme DUI, and Super Extreme DUI in a justice court. During the course of their representation, MayesTelles attorneys discovered important inconsistencies in the police reports. When we presented these issues to the State, the prosecutor’s office agreed to drop all DUI charges.
-
Fatal Commercial Vehicle Accident
MayesTelles Client A.F. and her husband tragically lost their unborn child as a result of the negligence of an individual operating a commercial vehicle in Yuma, Arizona. After substantial investigation including accident reconstruction and filing a lawsuit, the insurance company paid out the policy limits of $1,000,000.00.
-
4 Counts of Aggravated DUI Dismissed
Client M.W. was charged with 4 counts of Aggravated DUI in the Maricopa County Superior Court in July 2016 for allegedly riding a motorized bicycle under the influence. The attorneys at MayesTelles demanded that the State include certain materials in their presentation to the grand jury, resulting in the grand jury refusing to indict and the case being dismissed.
-
Client Charged with DUI
Client, GS, charged with DUI - sentence was reduced to reckless driving.
-
Client Facing Assault Felony
M.L. was charged with 1 count of Aggravated Assault, a class 3 dangerous felony. She plead guilty to Aggravated Assault, a class 6 undesignated felony, with a stipulation to 3 months of initial jail. She received credit for 32 days and the rest of the jail time was deferred. She was placed on 3 years of supervised probation. She has the opportunity to designate the offense a misdemeanor after successfully completing probation. Location: Maricopa County Superior Court
-
Client Charged with DUI
Our client, A.R, was charged with 1 count of DUI and 1 count of Failure to Control Speed to Avoid a Collision. During extensive pre-trial investigation, it was discovered that the police made many errors in how they handled the case. We were able to get the client's charges reduced to reckless driving. Location: Glendale City Court
-
Client Charged with Four Felony Counts
Our client, Ms. D., was charged with two counts of forgery - a class 4 Felony as well as theft - a class 2 Felony and also fraudulent schemes and artifices - a class 2 Felony. We were able to get her conviction reduced to a class 6 undesignated felony with the opportunity to reduce further to a misdemeanor. Location: Maricopa County Superior Court
-
Client Charged with Trespass & Assault
Our client, T.C., was charged in Maricopa County Superior Court on July 8, 2015 with 1 count of Criminal Trespass, a class 6 felony, and 1 count Assault, a class 2 Misdemeanor. On September 9, 2015, after an 8-day jury trial, our client was found not guilty on both charges. Location: Maricopa County Superior Court
-
Client Charged with Shoplifting
Our client, Ms. H., was charged with shoplifting - a class 1 misdemeanor. We were able to get her conviction set aside. Location: Phoenix Municipal Court
-
Client Faced 5 Felony Sex Offenses
Our client, Mr. C., was charged with five counts of felony sex offenses, including two counts of Sex Conduct with a Minor and three counts of Molestation of a Child. We were able to get the case dismissed upon a successful Motion to Dismiss. Location: Maricopa County Superior Court
-
Client Charged with Disorderly Conduct
Our client, K.F., was charged with Disorderly Conduct, a class 1 misdemeanor. We were able to get this client's case dismissed. Location: Tempe Municipal Court
-
Client Facing Multiple Criminal Charges
Our client, L.S., was charged on October 20, 2014 in Mesa for an assault, disorderly conduct, and criminal damage. MayesTelles PLLC was able to get those charges dismissed.
-
Client Facing Multiple Domestic Violence Offenses
Our client, Ms. C., was facing charges of assault / domestic violence (class 1 misdemeanor), disorderly conduct / domestic violence (class 1 misdemeanor), and criminal damage / domestic violence (class 1 misdemeanor). We were able to get our client's case dismissed. Location: Mesa Municipal Court
-
Charged with Assault & Failure to Appear
Our client, L.S., was charged in Phoenix on December 27, 2014 for assault and failure to appear. After completing diversion, our client's case was dismissed.
-
Multiple Felony Theft Offenses
Our client, Mr. C., was charged with Theft of Means of Transportation (Class 3 Felony) and Trafficking in Stolen Property (Class 3 Felony). Both class 3 felonies have a possible sentencing range of 2 - 8.75 years in prison. We were able to get our client's charge reduced to a Class 1 Misdemeanor with no jail time. Location: Maricopa County Superior Court
Why Choose MayesTelles PLLC?
-
Nearly 200 Years of Combined Experience
-
Thousands of Cases Successfully Handled
-
Voted Top 100 Trial Lawyers
-
Available to Our Clients 24/7
-
Former Prosecutors & Law Enforcement
-
AV Preeminent Rated Attorneys